Legal Opinion

Lowrance Buick Co. v. Mullinax

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 18, 1955No. 35618PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

It is contended by the general demurrers that the petition sets forth no cause of action, and that no cause of action is set out “in that petitioner seeks to bind defendant to a decree rendered in the Chancery Court of Bradley County, Tennessee, without any statement of facts justifying the erroneous legal conclusion that defendant was bound by the same.”

Code § 38-624 provides as follows: “Where a defendant mayliave a remedy over against another, and vouches him into court by giving notice of the pendency of the suit, the judgment rendered therein shall be conclusive upon the party vouched,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. Western & Atlantic RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Campbell v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Malsby & Co. v. WidincampCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Andrews v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keitz v. National Paving & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. State v. WoodSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
  3. Keitz v. National Paving & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API