Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Ritter

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 4, 2016No. 30845-6-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*495[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals April 12, 2016.]

Korsmo, J.

¶1 — After remanding for a hearing following our initial consideration of this appeal, we now consider Steven Ritter’s challenges to the jury’s decision to commit him as a sexually violent predator. In the published portion of this opinion, we address his challenge to the dynamic risk assessment tool used at trial. We affirm.

FACTS

¶2 The salient facts in this appeal largely concern procedural matters. Additional facts related to the issues considered in the unpublished portion of this opinion will be addressed in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. RikerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. CanadayWashington Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Det. of RitterWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In re the Detention of: Scott R. HalvorsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API