Legal Opinion

Ericson v. Lenertz, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1986No. CX-85-1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

Relator Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Assigned Risk Plan seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals which, following reference to a compensation judge for an eviden-tiary hearing, vacated an award on stipulation on the grounds of mistake of fact and law. We conclude respondent-employee Ivan C. Erieson did not make a sufficient showing of mistake of fact and that the provision for attorney fees did not involve mistake of law.

On many occasions we have recognized the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals has broad, though not unlimited,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Kenneth R. LaLonde EnterprisesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Maurer v. Braun's Locker PlantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Krebsbach v. LAKE LILLIAN CO-OP. CREAM. ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Goldberger Foods, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Monson v. White Bear MitsubishiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Stewart v. Rahr Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API