Legal Opinion

Hughes Tool Company v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 9, 1974PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAREY, Justice:

These are appeals by Hughes Tool Company and Rosemont Enterprises, Inc., plaintiffs below, from a judgment of the Court of Chancery in favor of defendants below, Fawcett Publications, Inc. and Noah Dietrich. Appellants contend that the Court below erred in dismissing the action on the ground that appellants have an adequate remedy at law. The sole question for our consideration at this time is whether these cases were properly instituted in the Court of Chancery.

The litigation arises out of contracts between appellee Noah Dietrich and Howard Hughes, and between Dietrich and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glanding v. Industrial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1945
  2. Elster v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  3. Elster v. American AirlinesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  4. In Re MarkelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
  5. Tull v. TurekSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Candlewood Timber Group, LLC v. Pan American Energy, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  2. McMahon v. New Castle AssociatesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
  3. International Business MacHines Corp. v. Comdisco, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1991
  4. Clark v. Teeven Holding Co., Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
  5. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API