Legal Opinion

Binder v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1987No. 01607PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Judge:

Generally, Restatement of Torts, 2nd (1965), § 388 imposes liability upon suppliers of chattel for negligent failure to disclose the chattel’s dangerous conditions. This appeal, involving injuries to an employee of the supplier’s bailee caused by the explosion of a cast-iron roll, presents questions regarding the existence and scope of the duty to disclose under § 388. The most significant of these questions is whether the supplier meets its standard of care by informing the bailee of the chattel’s general characteristics, but not providing specific information or warnings…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Atkins v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Ragan v. SteenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Rizzo v. MichenerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Doris Jacobs and Phillip Jacobs (93-4144) Patricia A. Adelmann (93-5978/6561) v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  4. Gaines v. KrawczykDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. O'BRIEN v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API