Bedford Investment Co. v. Folb
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
Respondent leased business property in Los Angeles to appellants by a written instrument dated October 17, 1945, the original draft of which contained a provision that the lessees should not assign the lease nor sublet any part of the premises without the lessor's written consent. Appellants objected to that provision as being too restrictive and to satisfy their objection the following words were added: “Lessor shall not arbitrarily withhold approval.” As so amended the lease was signed by lessor and lessees.
In April, 1946, appellants sublet a part of the premises to defendants Farrell and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kern Sunset Oil Co. v. Good Roads Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Miller v. ReidyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by23 opinions
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- California Ass'n of Nursing Homes Sanitaruims, Rest Homes & Homes for the Aged, Inc. v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Acoustics, Inc. v. Trepte Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Madonna v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.