Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Reinoehl

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1949No. 7509Published

1Dissent

The substance of appellant's attack, on rehearing, of the opinion is that Section 18-2808, I.C. simply defines an attempt and does not mean what it says, "unsuccessful attempt," and that there is no difference between an "attempt" and an "unsuccessful attempt," and dismisses the presence of the word "unsuccessful" in the statute as surplusage and its effect disregarded.

Of course, where the whole context of a statute or the clearly disclosed legislative intent requires, words may be disregarded as surplusage or interpolated and meanings changed or harmonized; but if a statute is not ambiguous,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Moody v. State Highway DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  4. United States v. MiroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. RaynerIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API