State of Vt. v. Staco, Inc.
District Court, D. Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLDEN, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiffs, State of Vermont and the Village of Poultney, Vermont, have invoked federal jurisdiction as granted to the district court by 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERC-LA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 as amended (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. § 6901, et seq. Pendent jurisdiction is asserted to adjudicate state claims under the provisions of the Vermont Waste Management Act, 10 V.S.A. § 6601, et seq. related Vermont statutory enactments, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- State of Colorado v. Idarado Mining Company, and Third-Party v. Baumgartner Oil Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Fund, Inc. v. Oppenheimer & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Mobay Corp. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.