Miedema v. Dial Corp.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SNELL, Justice.
Appellant, James Miedema, appeals from a decision of the district court upholding the industrial commissioner’s denial of benefits, finding that appellant’s injury did not arise out of his employment. We affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
James Miedema was employed as a laborer at The Dial Corporation. On August 19, 1991, after clocking in for his shift and while getting ready to work, Miedema went to the restroom at the plant to use the toilet. After turning to flush the toilet, he experienced severe pain in his lower back and had difficulty getting up and standing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mary R. Wheatley v. Herman Adler, Deputy Commissioner, United States Department of Labor Bureau of Employees' CompensationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Norland v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. McCookSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- United Parcel Service of America v. FettermanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Musselman v. Central Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Meyer v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- McIlravy v. North River Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Lakeside Casino v. BlueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Xenia Rural Water District v. VegorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Floyd v. Quaker OatsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.