Waterfowl Ltd. Liability Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
In response to the Petition for Panel Rehearing filed by Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellees Jardín Minerals Co. and Bruiere Minerals Co., and having duly considered the response and the reply, we grant rehearing, withdraw the prior panel opinion, 453 F.3d 291, in its entirety and substitute the following:
The United States appeals a judgment that its mineral royalty, attached to mineral servitudes on the relevant land, had (except for a forty-one acre tract) prescribed in accordance with Louisiana law because of the lack of qualifying production for a period in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Little Lake Misere Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Salling's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- At&T Universal Card Services v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Adams v. Unione Mediterranea Di SicurtaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lake Eugenie Land Development, Inc. v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- World Fuel Services Singapore Pte, Ltd. v. Bulk Juliana M/VCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Lake Eugenie Land & Development, Inc. v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Kielar v. GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Computer Sciences v. Tata ConsultancyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.