People v. Roseberry
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.
The defendant was charged with the offense denounced by section 337a, subdivision 2,.of the Penal Code. From a judgment of conviction of such offense, this appeal is taken. The case was tried by the court, without a jury, upon the evidence taken at the preliminary examination.
The sole question presented for decision is this: Was there any substantial evidence to sustain the judgment of conviction ?
Section 337a, subdivision 2, of the Penal Code prohibits any person from keeping or occupying any room, etc., “with a book or books, paper or papers, apparatus, device or paraphernalia, for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. TedescoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. ParkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. PruittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. InesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Redevelopment Agency of City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.