Legal Opinion

People v. Roseberry

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1937No. Crim. 3015PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

The defendant was charged with the offense denounced by section 337a, subdivision 2,.of the Penal Code. From a judgment of conviction of such offense, this appeal is taken. The case was tried by the court, without a jury, upon the evidence taken at the preliminary examination.

The sole question presented for decision is this: Was there any substantial evidence to sustain the judgment of conviction ?

Section 337a, subdivision 2, of the Penal Code prohibits any person from keeping or occupying any room, etc., “with a book or books, paper or papers, apparatus, device or paraphernalia, for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. TedescoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. People v. ParkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. PruittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People v. InesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Redevelopment Agency of City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API