Legal Opinion

State ex rel. C.T.G. v. M.A.B.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 11, 1997No. 2951513, 2960061PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YATES, Judge.

This is a paternity case.

C.T.G. and M.A.B. had previously been married; they divorced on October 1, 1984. In September 1985, the State, on behalf of C.T.G., the mother, filed a paternity complaint, asking the court to declare M.A.B. the father of J.B., bom April 19, 1985. On January 17, 1986, M.A.B. acknowledged paternity, without benefit of independent legal counsel and/or blood tests; the court, on that same date, declared M.A.B. to be the father and ordered him to pay $25 per week as child support. M.A.B. paid the court-ordered child support on a regular basis, subsequently…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. K.W. v. State ex rel. S.G.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. State ex rel. A. T. v. E. W.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. State ex rel. C.T.G. v. M.A.B.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API