Legal Opinion

Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. Scroggs

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 12, 1955No. 35754PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

In an action on an insurance policy, the proof that the car was stolen makes out a prima' facie case for recovery under policy provisions insuring against theft (Staten v. General Exchange Ins. Corp. of New York, 38 Ga. App. 415, 144 S. E. 53), and the burden of proving that the defendant is not liable because the loss falls within the terms of an exclusion clause is upon the defendant. North British &c. Ins. Co. v. Mercer, 90 Ga. App. 143 (82 S. E. 2d 41). Accordingly, the fact that the petition (which alleged the policy, the theft, and that the theft came within the terms of the policy, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ætna Life Insurance v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Wheeler v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Tripp v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Company v. KohlhaseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Canal Insurance v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Milburn v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Western Heritage Insurance v. Newcastle Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Aetna Insurance Company v. KaplanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API