Maatki v. Moore

ORDER AND REASONS

CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge.

This matter came before the Court on Motion of defendant, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (“Aetna”) for Summary Judgment. The gravamen of Aetna’s motion is that summary judgment is proper either because the policyholder validly rejected uninsured and underinsured (“UM”) coverage altogether, and/or that a valid selection of lower UM limits was made, which lower UM limits Aetna has in fact paid, 1 plaintiff having acknowledged receipt thereof and released of all claims against Aetna, regarding plaintiffs April 20, 1988 accident. 2 Plaintiff…