Legal Opinion

Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. Clark

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 8, 1936No. 4-4332PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Pursuant to the authority conferred by act 323 of the Acts of 1935 (page 889), the Game and Fish Commission passed and promulgated certain regulations for the protection of the wild life of the State. Among the regulations so passed was one prohibiting the chasing of deer with dogs in Grant and other counties, but not including the whole State, and changing the season and days in which deer might be taken in Grant and other counties, but not including the whole State.

Appellees, citizens of Grant county, sought to enjoin the Commission from promulgating and enforcing these rules relating to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matthews v. ByrdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. Smith v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. Special School District No. 60 v. Special School District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Dupree v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arkansas Health Services Commission v. Regional Care Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Magruder v. Arkansas Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Lockwood v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  4. Magruder v. Arkansas Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API