Legal Opinion
Blockstream Corporation, Thigmotropism LLC, and Adam Back v. Innosilicon Technology Ltd
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 26, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00902Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _______________________________________x BLOCKSTREAM CORPORATION, THIGMOTROPISM LLC, and ADAM BACK, Petitioners, 25-cv-902 (CM) -against- INNOSILICON TECHNOLOGY LTD, Respondent. ______________________________________x DECISION AND ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO VACATE THE ARBITRATION AWARD AND DISMISS THE PETITION AND GRANTING THE PETITION TO CONFIRM AND ENFORCE THE ARBITRATION AWARD McMahon, J.: The underlying dispute in this matter concerns the delivery of defective bitcoin miners. Petitioners entered into two sets of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred PickholzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- CONTEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Victrix Steamship Co. v. Salen Dry Cargo A.B.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Beijing Shougang Mining v. MongoliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.