Legal Opinion
United States v. Jessup
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided July 21, 1965No. Crim. No. 13682PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. MILLER, Chief Judge.
In the instant case defendants, J. Charles Jessup and Murphy Maddux, have moved by their attorneys for a change of venue from this district to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, pursuant to Rule 21(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 21(b) provides as follows:
“(b) Offense Committed in Two or More Districts or Divisions. The court upon motion of the defendant shall transfer the proceeding as to him to another district or division, if it appears from the indictment or information or from a bill of particulars…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. ChoateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Kott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
- United States v. OlenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clifford Jones v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, Judge of the United States District Court for Thedistrict of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United States v. GreenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- United States v. QuinnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- United States v. BenjaminDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- United States v. DorfmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.