Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Recorder of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1919No. Calendar No. 28,219PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Mandamus by Vincent M. Brennan, assistant corporation counsel, to compel William F. Connolly, recorder of the city of Detroit, and another to take a complaint for an alleged violation of a city ordinance.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The relator seeks mandamus to compel the respondents to take a complaint under a city ordinance of the city of Detroit for an alleged violation of the provisions of the section of an ordinance which prohibits “speeding,” so-called, in that city. The learned recorder took the view that the ordinance, in so far as it undertook to punish “speeding,” contravened the “Michigan motor vehicle law,” and refused *37to entertain complaints under the ordinance in his court for that offense. He also instructed the other respondent, the clerk of his court, to refuse to take such complaints.

Since the time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. People ex rel. Barrett v. BaconMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Melconian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Salt Lake City v. KusseUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Blank v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. City of Dearborn v. Sugden & Sivier, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Salt Lake City v. KusseUtah Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API