Legal Opinion

State v. . Parish

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from W. B. Allen, J., August Term, 1909, of WaTNE.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam :

The defendant attempted to appeal in forma pauperis. The affidavits were such as required by the statute (Revisal, sec. 3278), but the order allowing the appeal without giving bond was not signed by the judge, as required by Revisal, sec. 3279, but by the clerk. This latter is allowable only as to appeals in civil cases. Revisal, sec. 597.

Unless the requirements of the statute, both as to time and manner, are complied with, the appeal is not in this Court. The defect is jurisdictional, and we have no power to allow amendments, and the appellee has a right to have the appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . GatewoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. State v. BrambleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. . StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Powell v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. State v. . HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. State v. . StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API