March v. Gerstenschlager
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Commissioner.
Action in equity to establish a trust in real estate.
Respondent contends that this appeal should be dismissed because it contains allegations of error which were not preserved for review by a motion for new trial; however, under Civil Rule 73.01(d), V.A.M.R., no motion for new trial is necessary for an appellate review of a court-tried case, Russell v. Russell, Mo., 427 S.W. 2d 471, 475 [1, 2], and this case is thus for review in the manner specified by Civil Rule 73.01(d), to resolve, from a consideration of all the admissible evidence, “the question of the sufficiency…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Swon v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Suhre v. BuschSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- Basman v. FrankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Ferguson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Conrad v. BowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Fix v. FixSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Pollock v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Fulton v. FultonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Brennaman v. Andes & Roberts Bros. Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.