Legal Opinion
Proal v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 22, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-10126-TSHPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 7)
HILLMAN, District Judge.
Carol Proal (Plaintiff) brings this lawsuit to challenge the foreclosure of her home, *212which occurred in January of 2010. She asserts a bevy of claims, seeking to show that an assignment of the mortgage was void and that JP Morgan Chase & Co. (JP Morgan) and Citibank, N.A. (Citibank) (collectively, Defendants) violated the Massachusetts consumer protection law. Defendants move to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Fedei’al Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Rajamin v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McGillen v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N ADistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Speake v. The Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017