Legal Opinion
Clay v. Daiichi Shipping
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided November 10, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-3630PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
FALLON, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of defendants Japan Ship Owners’ Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association, Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha and Astraea Maritime S.A. (collectively “Vessel Interests”) for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing plaintiffs’ claims against them. For the following reasons, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Joseph and Ora Clay filed this suit to recover for injuries Joseph Clay sustained while working as a longshoreman for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kirksey v. Tonghai MaritimeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Baham v. NOBORS DRILLING USA, LPDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2010
- Aguilar v. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2011
- Price v. Atlantic Ro-Ro CarriersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Gonzalez v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.