Meyers v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for forgery by possessing a forged instrument with intent to utter it, knowing it was forged, upon a plea of guilty; the trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at five years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. However, there is much more to the case than that, for appellant presents a single ground of error that is more troublesome under the facts of the matter than the bare statement suggests. The ground is:
“The trial court erred by accepting the appellant’s plea of guilty without fully inquiring into whether…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Whitten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Ex Parte MorrowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Nicholas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Carranza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.