Legal Opinion
Citibank, N.A. v. Furlong
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 26, 1981PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 25, 1980 which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against defendant Furlong, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and *804the motion granted. Examination of defendant Furlong’s papers discloses that she does not deny executing the two promissory notes in question and making a payment on one of them, or dispute that the notes are in default and unpaid. Accordingly, plaintiff has established a prima facie case for summary judgment against said defendant (Seaman-Andwall Corp. v Wright Mach. Corp., 31 AD2d 136, affd…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Seaman-Andwall Corp. v. Wright Machine Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Seaman-Andwall Corp. v. Wright MacH. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Hogan & Co. v. Saturn Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by23 opinions
- Banque Nationale de Paris v. 1567 Broadway Ownership AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- European American Bank v. AbramoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Oates v. MarinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Artigas v. Renewal Arts Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Citicorp International Trading Co. v. Western Oil & Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.