Legal Opinion

Okmulgee Producing & Refining Co. v. Davis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 15, 1924No. 13330PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

Preliminary to a consideration of the merits of this proceeding, it is necessary to dispose of.a motion filed in this court by the plaintiff to dismiss this appeal. Plaintiff’s contention upon the motion to dismiss is that, since the record fails to disclose that defendant elected to stand upon its demurrer in the trial court, the order overruling said demurrer is not a final and appealable order. It is shown by the record that upon the overruling of its demurrer to the second amended petition the defendant reserved its exception and gave notice of its intention.to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Western & Atlantic R. v. UnderwoodDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1922
  3. Bartholomew v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Alton Water Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1922
  5. Exchange Oil Company v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Attaway v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Hopper v. StewardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. State Ins. Fund v. TrieschmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Wentz v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API