Legal Opinion
Jecies v. Matsuda
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 6, 1980No. 79 Civ. 3188 (CBM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Saul Jecies has moved for summary judgment in this action for breach of contract and quantum meruit against the defendant Fuji Office, Law, Patent and Account (“Fuji Office”) and the members of the alleged Fuji Office partnership: Mitsuo Matsuda; Kenichi Suemasa, Wako Matsuda, and Mikiya Igarashi. Plaintiff, a resi dent of New York, is an attorney and counselor-at-law in good standing and duly admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York. Plaintiff is also admitted to practice before the Patent and Trademark Office of the United…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Local 862, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Debra Davidson v. Stanadyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- International Mining Co., Inc. v. Allen & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- PaineWebber Inc. v. Westgate Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Zeno v. CropperDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.