Legal Opinion

Stirratt v. Kane

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1966No. 39846PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

The question for decision is whether a policy of liability insurance issued by the garnishee, Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company, obligates the insurer to pay a judgment obtained by plaintiff, Ralph E. Stirratt, against defendant, Frederick Kane, in an action for damages sustained by plaintiff as a result of defendant’s negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle owned by the Minneapolis Police Department. The critical fact is that both Stirratt and Kane were acting as employees of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. Village of PlymouthOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Myers v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. McDowell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. MalisfskiDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942
  5. Myers v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Barnette v. Hartford Insurance GroupWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Limon v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Barnette v. Hartford Insurance GroupWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API