Legal Opinion

Sand Hill Energy, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2002No. 1999-SC-1028-DG, 1999-SC-1029-DG, 2000-SC-0444-DGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

83 S.W.3d 483 (2002)

SAND HILL ENERGY, INC., Appellant,

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Appellees. and

Brenda Smith, Administratrix of the Estate of Tommy Smith, Appellant,

v.

Ford Motor Company, et al., Appellees. and

Ford Motor Company, et al., Appellants,

v.

Brenda Smith, Administratrix of the Estate of Tommy Smith, et al. Appellees.

Nos. 1999-SC-1028-DG, 1999-SC-1029-DG, 2000-SC-0444-DG.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

May 16, 2002.

Rehearing Denied September 26, 2002.

Clint J. Harris, Manchester, Counsel for Sand Hill Energy, Inc.

John A. Rogovin, Brian P. Brooks, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, DC, B.…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Cooper; Dissent · Graves.

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Estate of SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API