Legal Opinion

Dodge v. Durdin

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 1, 2005No. 01-04-00015-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ELSA ALCALA, Justice.

Appellant, Deborah Dodge, appeals from a no-evidence summary judgment and traditional summary judgment granted in favor of appellees, Jean Durdin, Granger Durdin, Raymond Durdin, Magic Moments Inc. and Magic Moments Stables. Dodge claims that she sustained an injury when an untamed horse kicked her in the abdomen as she was administering oral de-worming medication to the horse pursuant to direction from her employer and supervisor, appellee Granger Durdin. Dodge’s first, third and fourth issues on appeal assert that chapter 87 of the Civil Practice and Remedies…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Forbes Inc. v. Granada Biosciences, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Aleman v. Ben E. Keith Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  2. Hagberg v. City of Pasadena, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  3. Brenda Young v. Tisa McKim and Jacqueline McKim, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  4. Baker v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  5. Lee v. Loftin, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API