Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Briggs

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 19, 2012No. 12-3078Published

1Opinion of the Court

*932ORDER CERTIFYING STATE LAW QUESTION TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS

SCOTT M. MATHESON, JR., Circuit Judge.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 27.1 and the provisions of Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 60-3201 through 8207, requests that the Kansas Supreme Court exercise its discretion and accept the following certified question:

Under Kansas law, is proper notice sufficient to non-renew insurance coverage regardless of whether there is an authorized basis for non-renewal under the policy or Kan. Stat. Ann. § 40-276a?

The answer to this question is likely…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Feldt v. Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  2. Ochs v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API