Legal Opinion

Gettinger v. Glasser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 6, 1923No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

In the accompanying appeal between the same parties, this court has held that the National Surety Company was improperly stricken out as a party defendant, in view of defendants Glasser and Weinstein having set up a cause of action against it as an alternative to their counterclaim against plaintiffs, arising out of the disappearance of the same merchandise. (Gettinger v. Glasser, No. 2, 204 App. Div. 829.) Under the provisions of sections 237, 263 and 271 of the Civil Practice Act, the surety company was required to reply to the counterclaim within twenty days after service of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gettinger v. GlasserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  2. Grant v. Cananea Consolidated Copper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API