Legal Opinion

Land Clearance Authority v. Doerenhoefer

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 11, 1966No. 50921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONNELLY, Judge.

This is a condemnation case wherein Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. Louis is the plaintiff-respondent (the Authority), and Jack Esses Distributing Company is the defendant-appellant (Esses).

Esses has appealed from a judgment entered on a jury verdict assessing Esses’ damages at $55,000. The record shows that Esses’ claimed damages totaled $79,022 and evidence was adduced to support said claim. The amount in dispute, therefore, is $24,022. This Court has jurisdiction. Missouri Const.1945, Art. V, § 3, V.A.M.S.; State ex rel. State Highway *386Commission…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. Paramount Shoe Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. City of St. Louis v. RossiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Vorhof-Duenke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Biener v. St. Louis Public Service Co. (mo.app. 1942)Missouri Court of Appeals · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kelso v. C. B. K. Agronomics, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Daniels v. DillingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. CrainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Ferguson v. Missouri Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. State ex rel. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. ParmaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API