Legal Opinion

Stirnimann v. The San Diego

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 28, 1944PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, District Judge.

Libelant seeks to recover for damages to a giant amusement crane, owned by him, and Shipped at LeHavre, France, in the steamship San Diego, owned by the claimant and respondent, on or about November 25, 1938, for use at the San Francisco Exposition on Treasure Island, and which was delivered on the pier at San Francisco on January 4 and 5, 1939. The libel has two causes of action, the first alleging that respondent, a common carrier, received the crane, consisting of 126 parts, in good order and condition, and delivered it badly damaged; and the second, that the damage *799w…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. The FolminaSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. The DondoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  4. Gulden v. Hijos De Jose Taya S. En C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brazil Oiticica, Ltd. v. the BillDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1944
  2. Middle East Agency v. the John B. WatermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  3. Stirnimann v. the San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. Thomas Roberts & Co. v. Calmar SS CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Pannell v. the S.S. American FlyerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API