Legal Opinion
Hinkley v. Safepro, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided June 2, 1994No. 91-CV-1292PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION—ORDER
McAVOY, Chief Judge.
Currently before the court is a motion by Safepro Inc. (hereinafter “Safepro”) for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. With due regard given to the submissions of the parties, and after concluding that oral arguments would not facilitate disposition of this matter, the court finds that summary judgment should be granted in favor of the defendant.
1. Discussion
The current action brought by William and Louise Hinkley stems from an accident that occurred on March 12, 1991 while the plaintiff was working for V.A.W. From the facts submitted…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Delaware & Hudson Railway Company v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Momen v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996