Mitev ex rel. Miteva v. Resort Sports Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO REMAND
URSULA UNGARO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. D.E. 9. This Motion is fully briefed and ripe for disposition.
THE COURT has considered the Motion and the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs Motion to Remand is GRANTED.
Procedural History and Background
Plaintiff originally filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida on May 26, 2015. D.E. 1-1. On July 20,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Langlois v. Kirby Inland Marine, LPDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2015
- Lambert v. Melia Hotels International S.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021