Legal Opinion

Crowe v. Bolduc

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 25, 2003No. CIV. 01-260-P-DMCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

DAVID M. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Byron A. Crowe moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2) for an award of attorney fees pursuant to a guaranty executed in favor of Crowe and his wife, Ruth Crowe, by defendant J.P. Bolduc and a non-party, Crowe Rope Industries Limited Liability Company, on December 15, 1995. See Plaintiffs Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees (“Motion”) (Docket No. 55); Guaranty dated December 15, 1995 (“Guaranty”), attached as Exh. 1 to Defendant’s Objection to Plaintiffs Motion for Award of Attorney’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Williams v. Ashland Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
Carpenters Local Union No. 26 v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
Portland Valve, Inc. v. Rockwood Systems Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
Eastern Trading Company v. Refco, Inc., and Refco Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
Conjugal Partnership Comprised by Jones v. Conjugal Partnership Comprised of PinedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Pia Marine Homeowers Assn v. Kinoshita Corp.Superior Court of Guam · 2013