Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bidlingmeyer v. City of Deer Lodge

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1954No. 9290Published

1Dissent

MR. JUSTICE FREEBOURN:

(dissenting).

I. dissent for the following reasons:

The question to be answered by this court is: Does or does not the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action f.In determining whether'or not the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as against the demurrer, every material allegation of fact well pleaded is deemed true. Mills v. Pope, 90 Mont. 569, 4 Pac. (2d) 485; Toomey v. Penwell, 76 Mont. 166, 245 Pac. 943, 45 A. L. R. 993. For the purpose of determining the sufficiency of a complaint, attacked by a general demurrer,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Helena Light & Railway Co. v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Public Service Commission v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Toomey v. PenwellMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. French v. County of Lewis and ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API