Bidlingmeyer v. City of Deer Lodge
Montana Supreme Court
1Dissent
MR. JUSTICE FREEBOURN:
(dissenting).
I. dissent for the following reasons:
The question to be answered by this court is: Does or does not the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action f.In determining whether'or not the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as against the demurrer, every material allegation of fact well pleaded is deemed true. Mills v. Pope, 90 Mont. 569, 4 Pac. (2d) 485; Toomey v. Penwell, 76 Mont. 166, 245 Pac. 943, 45 A. L. R. 993. For the purpose of determining the sufficiency of a complaint, attacked by a general demurrer,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Helena Light & Railway Co. v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- Public Service Commission v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- Toomey v. PenwellMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- French v. County of Lewis and ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.