Legal Opinion

Hannon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 15, 1903No. 2452PublishedCited by 1 opinion

No statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDEBSOiST, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, and appeals. The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the recognizance fails to allege that appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, and also fails to state the amount of the fine assessed against appellant. Ve have examined the recognizance, and it is defective in both the respects pointed out. Instead of following the form prescribed in article 887, Code of Criminal Procedure, stating appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, it attempts to recite the particular offense for which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  2. Kees v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API