Pilcher v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Judge.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether, under the facts of this case, the “rape shield law” is an ex post facto law. 1 We hold that it is not.
I
The grand jury indicted Donald Robert Pilcher for rape of a female, child under age sixteen in violation of Code § 18.1-44, carnal knowledge of a female by anus or mouth in violation of Code § 18.1-212, and placing his hand upon a sexual or genital part of a child under the age of fourteen in violation of Code § 18.1-215. All the events were alleged to have occurred in 1969 under statutes that have since been recodified and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rose v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hunter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Commonwealth v. SilverNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2015
- Earth Pipeline Services, Inc. v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Welded Construction, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2020