United States v. Arciniega
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Alvaro Arciniega conditionally pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He now appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.
I
In early February 2007, officers in the narcotics unit of the Omaha, Nebraska, Police Department received a tip that Arciniega was distributing cocaine out of his home and electronics business. Officer Mark Lang led the investigation, and with the help of a cooperating witness, Lang scheduled a targeted buy for February 27, 2007. At a briefing on the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Amador Rodriguez Chaidez, A/K/A Rodriguez Amador Chaidez and Amador RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. VintonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. FrasherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. GolinveauxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Manuel AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Giron v. City of AlexanderDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.