Legal Opinion

United States v. Arciniega

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 24, 2009No. 08-3143PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Alvaro Arciniega conditionally pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He now appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.

I

In early February 2007, officers in the narcotics unit of the Omaha, Nebraska, Police Department received a tip that Arciniega was distributing cocaine out of his home and electronics business. Officer Mark Lang led the investigation, and with the help of a cooperating witness, Lang scheduled a targeted buy for February 27, 2007. At a briefing on the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. Amador Rodriguez Chaidez, A/K/A Rodriguez Amador Chaidez and Amador RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. VintonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. FrasherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. GolinveauxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Manuel AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  5. Giron v. City of AlexanderDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API