Legal Opinion

Paulsen v. Ability Insurance

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided October 29, 2012No. 1:11-CV-01019PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

CHARLES B. KORNMANN, District Judge.

Dorothy Paulsen filed a complaint against defendants alleging breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and seeking punitive damages. These accusations stem from a long-term care insurance policy *911purchased by plaintiff from Medico Life Insurance Company (“Medico”) in 1996, a policy which defendants admit Ability Insurance Company (“Ability”) has assumed the responsibility to adjust, manage and pay claims as appropriate under the policy. Plaintiff contends that defendants initially failed to pay…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Laura Dziadek v. The Charter Oak Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API