Legal Opinion
Niles v. Lee
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1912No. Docket No. 91PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Monroe; Golden, J. Bill by William E. Niles against Andrew E. Lee for an injunction and to establish an alleged interest of complainant in certain property. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
In June, 1909, complainant filed his bill of complaint in the circuit court for Monroe county, in chancery, alleging, among other things, that on or about November 12, 1908, he purchased at a receiver’s sale all of the property of the Toledo, Ann Arbor & Detroit Railroad Company, in the State of Michigan, “ for and in behalf of himself and Andrew E. Lee of Yermillion, South Dakota, jointly”—
“That after and during the months of January, February, and March, 1909, your orator purchased and contracted for the purchase for a railroad, rights of way, etc., from Dundee to Jackson, Mich., as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Noble v. GrandinMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Sullivan ex rel. Orton v. KenneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Hurlbut v. BritainMichigan Supreme Court · 1846
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lyle Cashion Company v. McKendrickMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
- Niemetta v. TeakleMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- McKay v. PalmerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988