Legal Opinion

Anderson v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 25, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The appeal presents the single question as to whether the gradation of a\d valorem municipal taxes by zones, as contemplated by the act in question, violates the constitutional requirement of uniformity in taxation. We think it does.

The pertinent provisions of the Constitution are as follows:

“Art. Y, sec. 3. Taxation shall he by uniform rule and ad valorem; exemptions. Laws shall be passed taxing, by a uniform rule, all moneys, credits, investments in bonds, stocks, joint-stock companies, or otherwise; and, also, all real and personal property, according to its true value in money,” etc.
“Art.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Redmond v. Commissioners of the Town of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Jones v. CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jamison v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Senior Corp. v. Board of Assessment AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Dyer v. City of LeaksvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Banks v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Trust Co. v. . Maxwell, Comr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API