Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyerland Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1992No. 89-6118PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*514DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:

Proceedings Below and Appellate Jurisdiction

Meyerland Co. and William M. Adkinson sued Continental Savings Association (“Continental”) for, among other things, usury and fraud in state court. Continental counterclaimed for fraud and breach of contract. The trial court awarded Continental $30,031,089.99 and Adkinson $1,124,-109.59 in damages. Meyerland and Adkin-son appealed.

After the appeal was filed, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board declared Continental insolvent and appointed the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) as receiver. The FSLIC removed to…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Meyerland Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Tilley v. Anixter Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  3. Green v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Kahlil Zoom-In Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Matter of 5300 Memorial Investors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API