Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Pinnell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 1989No. 16299Published

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Relator sought, in the underlying action, to condemn property owned by Lloyd A. Garoutte and Alice M. Garoutte. Following the initial hearing on relator’s condemnation petition, respondent stated that he would dismiss the petition for relator’s failure to show good faith negotiations to purchase the property, but would stay the order for fifteen days if relator wanted to seek prohibition or mandamus.

Within that time relator filed a petition seeking this court’s order prohibiting respondent from dismissing the condemnation petition and issuing a writ of mandamus directing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Oxendine v. Public Service Co. of Ind., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Weatherby Advertising Co. v. ConleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. PinkleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API