Legal Opinion

Tennessee Products & Chemical Corp. v. Dickinson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1953PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor

This is a suit under Code 'Section 1790, to recover penalties paid under protest, assessed for the non-payment of the total amount of taxes due under the Sales and Use Tax Act, Chapter 3, Public Acts of 1947, as amended.

In February 1952, the complainant, on the report of a State auditor, was back-assessed for Sales and Use Tax for the period from June 1947, the effective date of the Act, to and including October 1951. It is admitted that during this period the complainant had made returns and paid Sales and Use Tax as required by law, in the total amount of $223,934.31, and. the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hooten v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. RowanTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. East Tennessee Brewing Co. v. CurrierTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Mills v. County of ThurstonWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Knox v. EmersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Oliver v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  2. International Harvester Company v. CarrTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Swartz v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Combustion Engineering Company v. McFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  5. United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co. v. MoyersTennessee Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API