Hooker v. . Forbes
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The sheriff’s return notes the service of process by reading the summons to the defendants and by delivering to each of them a copy both of the summons and of the complaint. As the return is prima facie correct it cannot be set aside unless the evidence in contradiction is clear and unequivocal. Commissioners v. Spencer, 174 N. C., 36; Trust Co. v. Nowell, 195 N. C., 449. The affidavit of the appellant discredits the return and that of the deputy sheriff supports it. The court found as a fact that the summons had been served as the statutes direct, and this finding is conclusive. Chemical Co.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Henderson v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Vick v. . FlournoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Redmond v. . MullenaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Cheatham v. . CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Calmes v. . LambertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re K.J.L.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- Harrington v. RiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Boone v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Washington County v. . BlountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Beck v. VoncannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.