Legal Opinion
Soto v. Dickey
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 20, 1984No. Nos. 83-2380, 83-2381PublishedCited by 253 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLAM, Senior District Judge.
Alleging violation of their constitutional rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and of Rules and Regulations of the Waupun Correctional Institution through the improper use of mace, a trade name for tear gas, and similar chemical agents, in the adjustment center at said institution in the State of Wisconsin, Carlos S. Soto and Robert DeMallory (Mallory) instituted a class action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Appeal No. 83-2380, for injunctive and declaratory relief. Carlos S. Soto, also instituted a separate action…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by253 opinions
- Santiago v. WallsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Williams v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Edward Furnace v. Paul SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Lewis v. DowneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.