Legal Opinion · Dissent

First Interstate Bank of Fargo, N.A. v. Larson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1991No. Civ. 900386Published

1Dissent

ERICKSTAD, Chief Judge,

respectfully dissents.

Although this writer, in Lembke v. Unke, 171 N.W.2d 837 (N.D.1969), and in two cases decided the year before that, Iverson v. Lancaster, 158 N.W.2d 507 (N.D.1968), and in Melland v. Johanneson, 160 N.W.2d 107 (N.D.1968), concluded that prior decisions of this Court must be overruled, notwithstanding the respect normally due precedent, I do not believe that it is proper to overrule Mandan Sec. Bank v. Heinsohn, 320 N.W.2d 494 (N.D.1982). Contrary to the compelling circumstances and the evolutionary growth of the law, over an extended period of time…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Iverson v. LancasterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hartigan v. . Casualty Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Barringer v. MieleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  5. Lembke v. UnkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API