Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Mayflower Transit, Inc.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided December 14, 2000No. 3:98CV349-MUPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MULLEN, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court upon the memorandum and recommendation of United States Magistrate Max 0. Cogburn, Jr., filed November 13, 2000. The parties were advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), written objections to the memorandum and recommendation must be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. It appears to the court that the parties have not filed any such objections.
After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate’s memorandum, the court concludes that the recommendation to grant the summary judgment motion of Defendants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Edward Lester Schronce, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parramore v. Tru-Pak Moving Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
- Moore v. LA HABRA RELOCATIONS, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Azzil Granite Materials, LLC v. Canadian Pacific Railway CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023